When signing the marriage certificate, the state gives two options: Marriage for Separate Assets or Marriage for Common Assets, but what are the advantages and disadvantages of each of these situations?
Marriage by definition is a social institution that creates a link between its members , in legal issues, cultural issues and customs; marriage is the fusion of love and a level of commitment in which you want to share experiences, experiences and evidently material things, however it is essential to consider that in any union there can be irreconcilable problems and differences that bring about a separation, it is for that reason before signing the paper that will keep you legally united to another person, it is important to talk about what will be the conditions of the agreement in case of rupture of the relationship.
When signing the marriage certificate, the state gives two options: Marriage for Separate Assets or Marriage for Common Assets, but what are the advantages and disadvantages of each of these situations?
It refers to the fact that any material acquisition made before and from the moment of marriage was totally and absolutely made by the person who made it, that is, any purchase, sale or even debt will be assumed individually without involving the spouse; the wife or husband may dispose of their material things without the authorization of the other. However, any real or personal property purchased during the marriage can be divided depending on the purchase conditions of the same. Due to the high rate of divorce today, a large percentage of couples who marry in these times, opts for this option because it allows you to save yourself from many problems in case you make the decision to separate.
This regime establishes that all debt, real or personal property acquired during the marriage are the responsibility and property of both parties equally . This means that regardless of who owns any property, this is the possession of both, just like a debt, regardless of who acquired it, it is the obligation of the two spouses to liquidate it.
This type of regime has been gradually lost over time due to the fact that women are becoming more independent and therefore every time a smaller percentage dedicates their full time to being a housewife, so that also having income exists greater equality before an economic situation. Previously the marriage by joint property was the most besieged option at the time of the commitment, since there were many fewer divorces and it was thought not to leave the woman and the family helpless, however the roles have been gradually equating and therefore Despite being a couple, there is greater independence on the part of both parties.
The decision before the chosen regime is yours, however you have to keep in mind that love does not last forever, you have to think coldly before making the decision and consider that in every union there is a possibility of separation.
What is your opinion on this topic? What would you do?
If it seemed like a good post, please vote and share!
