That definitely works too. As long as 1sp 1vote(in total), we achieve the same goal.

I agree that we should build trustless system that we do not need to rely on "promises".

Unless I am missing somthing, I think 1sp 1vote is natural way to go.

Thank you for pointing it out. Yes, I suspect the same (untold) reason - will see how it develops.

I hope we can adopt this.

Thank you for the comment. I was thinking about the downvote option also, but just wanted to move step by step.

Just to clarify: it's 1 steem power 1 vote, not 1 steem account 1 vote. As you mentioned already, the latter is vulnerable for exploits.

The problem is, with supermajority of witnesses anything can happen, so written in code is not as safe as it seems.

I appreciate your detailed analysis. We should hope for the best, but at the same time prepare for the worst.

거의 모든 증인들이 지금도 파워다운을 계속 하고 있는 것과 비슷한게 아닐까요. 입으로 떠드는것과 실제 지갑은 다른 메시지를 보내는.

While I disagree with 22.2, I still vote for you (and I encourage others to do so also) as I believe that your passion and hard work helps Steem to progress. Cheer up, and I believe that you will be back

오오 10%면 할만하겠네요. 전 암호화폐 아직도 익숙하지 않아서 이런 건 포기..

Thank you for the writeup. But I believe that simply demanding him to remove puppet witnesses would go nowhere. If you were him, how could you be certain that 22.2 would not happen again? The moment he

공감합니다. 이대로 저스틴이 물러설 수는 없을거에요.

명작이죠. 저도 시간나면 해보고ㅜ싶...

I agree with you that previous witnesses should come up with some solution.

오오 축하드립니다!

저도 여기 가끔 갑니다. 모르는 사이 마주쳤을지도..

Thank you for sharing your opinion. a bit late reply, but better late than never.

Etf가 운용보수가 1%라니... 어이없는 수준이군요.