Even though I personally own 4 BF commons, 1 BF rare and 1 BF Epic, as well as 4 maxed GF CA legs + the RFs for a total of 689,458 CP and and additional 336,910 CP in RB cards, so like 850,000 CP in total to put on wagons for the Conflicts, I feel the ones who are definitely getting screwed are the max RF players. They invested just as much in CA, as in RB but they will get significantly less airdrops due to how much the extra CP on BFs will increase the overall requirements for guaranteed chances of getting an airdrop. I also think this is basically making the "perk" of still being able to stake RB cards for 50% of the CP on wagons pointless cause it will just serve as a justification for the higher airdrop requirements apart from the glaring issue with BFs. Judging by Matt's answer to my question about this on the TH yesterday, I'm sure we'll see at least a 2X (if not even more) increase in the requirements for a guaranteed airdrop, and as I've already said, that will hurt the RF players the most, which is kinda unfortunate because generally RF players should be the largest group, and the group which the game caters to the most. Ofc, that's not the case with SPL as we know which the group the game caters the most to is. Can't really blame them, said group is currently paying most of the bills after all.. :-)
Words
255
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
1y
RE: Conflict Airdrops: Are We Getting "Screwed"?