how 0 sim income cities hurt SIM economy with no SIM to sell? You know that taxation and SIM price comes from cities making SIM and selling SIM. Possible that 0 SIM cities actually spend hive rewards from

I think this post is mostly about flippening, and you could just rewrite it same way for splinterlands and buying packs. Generally it's weird to build opinion about game from flippening aspect. Also when

0.11 is very strong, should go up from this point, you can also see I try to sell when price is up and hold when it's down. selling at 0.11 hurts, selling at 0.14 hurts too. When we will see 0.2+ I think

Can also add that I made once a deal with developer to pay him X HIVE, and before he finished job Hive lost 30% value. He will not agree to take hive anymore and I feel bad about this situation too...

My suspicion is that a lot of people who use hive in general are also selling hive :) and it is 50-100x more than distributed dcity rewards or part of hive I took for creating game :)

Splinterlands made millions of $ and they don't distribute steem/hive back to players :)

What should I do with hive in your opinion, hold it? How I can pay devs, designers, hostings? :) also ~500k sold in year compared to ~28M produced in rewards is nothing. Still someone buys it and maybe

one of the coolest thing about making a game is creation of useless items then adding value to it after some time :) People speculating on everything

to dcityauction for auction :) 1 by 1 random art from dcityauction every few days auctioned

i know about the issue just hard to verify with explorers not working...

yep it stays in pool

There is 10-30% tax on hive rewards for cities with 0 income, set by president. And it is 30% now :)

sorry missed it :) vote timing was always a part of this blockchain, still not sure how 5min is better than 15min :)

yes, but they can lease power for 14% :) I don't see nothing wrong in increasing average rewards on few hundreds posts from few hundreds authors by 1-2$. The question is, if that should give best curation

Why no one talking about how 5min voting window creates the issue ? Changing the curve to reduce difference and efficiency of 3min voting against 5h voting could help. Not sure how difference math works,

hmm, i just tested if display on bot works 😌

can you imagine free to play game on the blockchain paying out rewards? :o

99% of games on blockchains are ponzi schemes with extra rules. Here reward pool earn extra 20% APR with curation. And players also earn multiple tokens which have actually higher value than HIVE reward

I think it's a chicken and egg conundrum. no. If you add 1M$ liqudity to swap.eos on engine it will change nothing. If you add liquidity to dec it will decrease profit shares for other liquidity providers.

Not true, it needs volume, people trading then liquidity comes in. Liquidity without volume is worthless, and volume creates liquidity - it's worth to do amm on token with high volume. Pooling is basically