I should be more careful,....it's not that I want to burn bridges, but it is the duty of the intellectual to expose lies and tell the truth, even if that bursts the little princesses' bubbles.
So, with that in mind,....
It seems that the shot across the bow has not worked, 'they' are going to go on duping those new to the concept of anarchism, as if they didn't see my post.
If you are following those folks, they may be well intentioned, but they are definitely mis-informed.
If you want to find out about anarchism, and why anarchists have given their lives for more than 150 years to achieve it, you gotta read.
I would suggest not reading ANY book that was printed after 1940.
If you get lucky enough to find a dictionary, or encyclopedia, from before 1920 you will see why I tell you this.
If you want to know another, look here.
This is an article from the time, by a lady that should know, she shaped the word 'anarchy' like few others.
If you want heroes you shouldn't look to contemporary figures, unless they are insurrectionary, otherwise they can only regurgitate the originals, many poorly.
If you want to learn about anarchy, look in the source.
If you want to be led astray by folks that aren't even real enough to speak up when I publicly chastise them, well, you'll end up coming to the same conclusions I have, or you'll be used for purposes you don't even realize exist.
