The investipedia definition of a Ponzi Scheme states:

"The Ponzi scheme generates returns for early investors by acquiring new investors. This is similar to a pyramid scheme in that both are based on using new investors' funds to pay the earlier backers. Both Ponzi schemes and pyramid schemes eventually bottom out when the flood of new investors dries up and there isn't enough money to go around. At that point, the schemes unravel."

This is literally what that game intends to do, just because they are open about their intentions doesn't mean it's not a Ponzi scheme.

My downvote is nothing compared to your shameless self-promoting upvote. I simply disagreed with you rewarding yourself for promoting a Ponzi scheme game in an investing forum. If @steem.leo wants to attract serious discussion it can't have posts like these trending. People read this junk and think it's a place where promoting pump and dump Ponzi games is accepted as an investment discussion.

Regarding point 5. Please educate yourself, this is a not VC and certainly not comparable to AAPL. This is only profitable for the people who enter early.

The project isn't deceptive, it's a rather transparent game, you promoting it as a "buying a short-term money manager" was misleading.