NASA is one of the leading AGW propaganda institutions. However, the numbers you are citing above are vastly different than those published by Lindzen and Happer. Lindzen and Happer say that water vapor provides ~90% of the GH effect, and CO2 and the several other GH gases combined provide the other ~10%.

why exactly do you have literal FAITH in Lidzen and Happer? you sound like they're priests of your church. let's doubt nasa, but not these guys? okay, but why? why should I trust them? what's so special about them? if they suddenly posted a study stating that climate change is real, would you also follow them and change your entire worldview because of this? your praise is unreal. they're just two humans. why would you decide to never question them...?

do you understand why consensus is important? it happens so the world doesn't just take your word for granted. it's so you can't forge results. you publish your paper, other people verify through experiment to see if what you're doing is replicable, and if it is replicable, then the fact that it is replicable will be published. if it is not replicable, then the fact that it is not replicable will be published.

IMG source - Lindzen and Happer (2025) Pg. 13

I'm going to have to start asking for sources of authors who don't show up in the website you've referenced before