Oh, I can certainly relate to that and I agree, very much so, that I am aware of my limitations. I don't see anything I could say against that. I count this as self-knowledge.

I learned later that the more I know, the more I know how little I know... I can confirm that. (please forgive my little Lent joke) I forgive you for every joke. Jokes are very easy to forgive - LoL almost

Thank you. If you out yourself and say that you are a Christian, you are immediately faced with the "omnipotent and omniscient" God figure. I think my whole post was to say that I am a Christian,

You are a poet with words. The story got me right into the scenery and everything what followed. Yes, all that happened to me too, when I encountered someone drunk and myself being/feeling sober. LoL -

i do however hope that most of the fear is also based on lies. i have heard cases that argue there is no such thing as mrna and an immune system to begin with, that that is solely based on an antiquated

I think a lot of our thoughts are thought by those other participants, and we have no opportunity to be aware of them. I come back to my very first response in which I said that this is a

Because all statements on the part of religion & humanism (philosophical, moral, ethical etc. etc.) are irrelevant to you as a whole, the conversation I have staged is also irrelevant to you, I have

Religion is utterly malleable and not infrequently used by pathological scammers to defraud people I could say that about every other aspect of human life. Since everything can be used for fraud. Science

by hundreds of other faith I use "faith" in its religious context. What I hear when you said it like you did, is not "faith" but actually "tastes", which I find is a big

Theology, I have tried to point out, isn't prone to being tested. I got that. Still, theology is being a faculty. Would you like to erase it from the field, so it cannot be further something one shall

You make it hard for me to come to common terms with you. I prefer this kind of method of indeed coming to an - at least temporarily - agreement. Of course, we need not to agree. But it makes a discussion

Alright, did you indeed come to a common understanding with me about the term paradox used in my given context? Including me re-phrasing the scene?

You say that no state of validity can exist apart from the scientific proof of the invalidity of a statement, method, thesis, hypothesis or theory? Did I understand that correctly? Here I see a problem

So, you would describe my personal use of the term "paradox" in the given context as something, you cannot comprehend? In case, you do not comprehend, every attempt from my side in wanting to

Cannot open that website. But I would answer that I am well aware of such things, maybe more than you'd assume. So I am attempting to what I consider is sensible to do. My above in the post given

he has all the means at his disposal to become aware of his thoughts. Let me rephrase the scene, as this initiated your response. Two people are talking about rules. One says: "I am who I am, with

So the definition, for example, of the word "paradox" is valid until it has been falsified, do I understand you correctly?

I had questions for you that you left unanswered. Why did you prefer not to answer them? Without going into the details of your answer, I would like to know what you understand by the term

Having nothing against being disagreed with. Though I'd rather have had that in my last post :) In this one I would like to welcome some other interpretations of Genesis or any other book of the bible.

Good luck for you. Having some hard work done, needs to find a place where it can unfold. Always good to do something out of the four walls to escape stupor, I agree. Do you find it difficult to remember