Opinion on the Airdrop Proposals

         So the day has come. It's time to decide what to do about those who missed out on the initial HIVE airdrop. I don't like writing Hive-specific posts, but here's my understanding of the situation.

         There are 3 proposals available.

For individuals that supported hostile take over
For proxied voters
No more airdrops

         If you look at the list of people affected, you'll soon find yourself at a dilemma. There are both bad actors and innocent individuals who made mistakes. How do we rectify this? This makes no sense!

         Ah, but carry on reading on the main @hiveio post. When you get to this part, things begin to make sense.

The "No Additional Airdrop" proposal has an extended voting period well into the future. This will allow it to serve as the companion to any individual proposals or groups that may come up after the main voting. It allows for the community to give feedback on the airdrop outside of the context of the return proposal, saves anyone who chooses to create an additional "for" vote the cost of creating an additional "against," and allows those who are against airdrops to vote without impacting development of community proposals seeking funding unrelated to initial distribution.

         In essence, the No Additional Airdrop proposal will serve as a Return Proposal. Any individual pleas that gain support past that will receive their airdrop. This way, the community could help individuals without giving in to those who harmed us.

My Verdict

1. Vote for no additional airdrop.
2. Support individuals to push out their proposals.
3. Support the said proposals.
4. Let the bad actors be out of the airdrop they were not entitled to in the first place.

Tl;dr - Support No Additional Airdrop proposal. Help individual proposals later.

_{These are my opinions and does not reflect general consensus.}