We've been having this conversation in an empty room for over six months.

There is no insight left to be extracted from this discussion.
A daisy chain of liabilities strung together pretending to be assets...
Oh wait I'm doing it again.

I grow weary of this circular conversations based on unproven assumptions.
It's tiring to be told these things are "simple" and "easy to get" when I'm the one with the blog and have the comments of real people saying they have no idea what the fuck is going on. It's ironically an insult to intelligence to fall back on these generalizations and then project the idea that I'm the one being over-emotional and irrational.

You have less than 30 blog posts on your account over the last 4 year cycle, and literally none of them are about this super complex topic that you like to pretend is simple. Go explain it to people and show me they get it. If it's so simple teach someone this issue and have them debate me on it. See what happens.

But the projection doesn't stop there because I've had the tactical high-ground in this discussion the entire time. The burden of proof is on your camp to prove beyond a doubt that this thing is going to work. It's not a wing-it situation where we fuck around and find out. It's much easier to argue doing nothing than vampire attacking the current system and completely changing it all at once with zero prototype or proof-of-concept.

So when you say things to me like: "I support AMM and I would run the code if you wrote it." Yeah, right back at you x10 on that front. Just make the prototype and stop theory-crafting. Nobody on the chain seems impressed by either of us. This is a waste of breath. As you well know by now: saying things and bringing them to life are completely different magnitudes.