But that isn't the official explanation: it's just more armchair experts trying to get attention.
And yet you've taken it and are now using this as supporting counter-evidence.
I asked what incentive they have to throw of off the scent and your reply was to throw us off the scent.
This is problematic, yes?

There's a reason I waited a couple days to even have this discussion.
The information available is lacking and conjecture is very high.
I'll probably have to circle back in the coming weeks.

But on a very real level it does not matter if the act was revolutionary or not.
Perception is reality.