For the most part this is decent sentiment but also USD can't just blow up in a puff of smoke. Inflation has to go to 20%... then 30%... then 40%... then 50%. USD can step on all the other fiat currencies

Gonna be boom and bust no matter what just like every cycle. Which is unfortunate but there are no cryptocurrencies that have an elastic supply. Is what it is. It would be nice to get a more distributed

Haha I know right. Still it technically hasn't begun until we break lower than the channel.

Looking back four years dominance didn't peak until March when price was over $50k up from $10k. So I may indeed have jumped the gun a bit here. There's still a lot more wiggle room in that ascending channel

What exciting things are happening on hive? Hive's biggest problems are liquidity and smart contracts. We should have a solution soon. We are going to have decentralized wrapped Bitcoin on chain that we

Less projects that skyrocket, smaller % gains on btc, and a much tamer bear market. Strong disagree on that front. This run is going to be stronger than 2021 in every way. The diminishing returns theory

For me it's more of a feeling than anything else. It's when I start to feel very generous and I'm giving crypto away without a care in the world. No-coiners are asking me if they should invest. I'm taking

Initial uncertainty of turnout is typical for every election. Why do you think this is? My guess is going to be because turnout is directly calculated from the votes and any number you get before that

Is this a joke? You haven't linked a single piece of data. Did you even click that link? You're trolling at this point.

Got it so your source is "trust me bro" and you refuse to link anything. You also refuse to wait for all the votes to be counted. You've also decided there are more registered voters because...

First of all: how do you think voter turnout is calculated? Second of all: do you believe the denominator in this equation (the number of registered voters) stays the same every four years? You seem to

If your question is: why is the turnout 66% when the turnout isn't 66%? Then the answer is the turnout wasn't 66%. Right? Just wait for the situation to unfold. That's the real answer.

You are very clearly making an accusation simply by assuming there should be the same number of votes. Why are you operating under this assumption? The answer is obvious; there's only one reason to make

Sounds like you're operating under some kind of premise that Harris should get as many votes as Biden even though Harris is wildly unpopular and the Biden administration fucked up the entire economy. In

By the end of 2020, he held just over 9 ETH, his portfolio sitting at about 3.5x his entry. But due to personal issues, he decided to sell in October 2020. At that time, ETH was around $400, but by May

chat is this real?

What I think is interesting are the small trickle of democrats who are like, "lol wait did we actually cheat in 2020?" It takes an overwhelming amount of power to flip someone like that.

The point being made is that the goalpost is constantly moving which makes everyone look like a childish idiot and completely undermines the entire argument. Oh dems will just cheat in 2024. Oh dems didn't

It was a Twitter link I perhaps should have used a screenshot. More consistent across frontends.

He's 78 years old you can't teach an old dog new tricks. It's a super awkward situation for a lot of reasons. I'd like to focus on the opportunity being granted to crypto and how we can leverage that into