How much exactly did he steal from you? Come up with documentation and seek arbitration (not using a government court). And, if you have proof he robbed you, and he refuses to give back your property,

I'm not going to implement anything. I won't violate people for their own good. Sorry. Becoming what I hate would be pointless. And while your attempts at insults are kinda cute and all, they are so far

Why not both?

Your response is, quite honestly, crazy. It is a nonsequitur and a strawman. I don't believe in the supernatural, plus trade-- which is how I got my house-- is the most human of activities; it's not

No. That would be absurd. See the response to your other identical comment. Plus, "tax" is just a dishonest word for theft, and a "tax" is never limited to the guilty.

No. To take over a criminal gang is to become the criminal gang. The State never limits its acts to the guilty. To support the State is to advocate harming everyone just to get back at some who are guilty.

Gorgeous, smart ladies!

That has nothing whatsoever to do with the discussion at all, but I didn't steal it or coerce anyone into "selling" to me.

If someone steals your watch and you take it back, you are not a thief. If you imagine someone stole your watch, but you sold your watch to them, and you "take it back" you're the thief. I'm

How would I know? If he stole it (which includes fraud and using government/politics to get his money) then he's a crook like any other-- just maybe more successful than most. That crooks exist doesn't

Same old same old. LOL. But steemit is getting to feel like a ghost town these days.

And the moment you start "redistributing" other people's stuff you're a thief (a user of the political means)

And, to those who whine about hierarchies:

Any molestation is justified if these monsters can yell "It's for the children!" Truly disgusting.

I almost didn't share that to Steemit at all for that reason. But I hated to post all the questions here, knowing he'd never answer here (it may be days before he responds anyway-- he tends to wait for

Probably more if you value liberty. For me, three would be a slow day.

I love the design. But I'm strange.

I don't even like that companies sell things to government-- I would prefer they didn't. But it is what it is.

I can't find it, but years ago I read something (by L. Neil Smith, perhaps) about a "pizzaocracy"-- a description of libertarianism illustrated by how people decide what toppings to order and

Yeah, if humans have no rights, no one can have the "right to rule" so we are back to "Leave me to live as I want".