😂 you right. The salt content is high 🤣 but doesnt mean the statements aren't legit. And Splinterlands ain't getting another penny from me for a proposal 😆

The fact that Matt, a large decision maker in this ecosystem/game/company believes this will be beneficial. Is a prime example of why this company has continued to fail with bad leadership for years.

Here are some numbers for you. Just played a couple games in gold 2 wild. Earned just under 0.4sps per win. Assuming you play the 24 games/day and you win 50% of your games. Thats 12 wins and I’ll round

Lmao this is another joke proposal right?! There are just so many @ss backward things here that I couldn’t list them all. So you’re saying I need to pay $10 to buy a Spellbook, then spend thousand of dollars

Lmao I’m dreaming right? So the logic here is to provide more incentives for people to play a bad game? Once again people are wasting their time and money on these proposals that in no way makes the game

Lmao “bot this, bot that” going around in circles putting little bandaids on a cancerous tumor that is the game just sucks. Players are leaving and none are joining. The final attractive piece of this

This right here is the real solution. Running around worry about all this bot stuff isn't the issue. More players are needed yet people keep wasting their time on these type of silly bandaid proposals

Lmk if you find one! 😆

Actually sometimes you do, because when you're "nice" all the time and there are no results a fire needs to be lit, the stick needs to come out. And after 3-years of constantly poor decisions

You're spot on with all of this. Now if only if the Splinterlands team would listen but it seems to always fall on deaf ears. I suggested a way to make the game more fun/accessible without having to poor

True. I can see that point of view but I see it as an added benefit when it is free. I wouldn’t pay anything to play in tournaments, even for pennies. I’d rather use those pennies to buy more Sps. But

I don’t mind these types of proposals. I agree it is a lot of money but you need to spend money to make it. I think there are two things people are missing from this. 1) it is a minimum of two developers.

I’m not a fan of the changes yet remain hopeful that it will at least mix up the game to make it a little better for existing players with the shop vs chests. I agree it sucks to have wild be “punished”

They've had to revamp the tournaments. Thankfully, they’re just about all free now so they're basically taking the approach of "we'll pay you to play our game" the sad part is that still isn't

I would say I’m disappointed that this proposal is going to pass but with the amendments requiring NPE and Validators to be completed within 365 days there is more than a good chance one or both of these

You don’t make money, at first. That’s the same “investment” you’ve been asking of your users. Please name one asset released that’s actually retained or increased in value? Every asset has been depreciating

Kudos to you Matt. You took a very harsh response and stuck with trying to find a way to listen and improve instead of letting things devolve (I'm not being sarcastic here). The only way this game grows

lol against your stupidity shows. As never once was anything free being asked for. Instead it was criticism on how poorly things are run. A good leader can listen to the criticism. Idiots like you, well

lol obviously delusional and ignoring facts. This is the type of idiots this game attracts apparently 😆 How sad.

Ideas on how to bring in more players in my blog below: Changing Spellbooks and a better experience You’re right. There are certainly some unique aspects of the game. I’m glad you’re enjoying it but are