You're welcome, it is part of what we are there for. Answering questions is how many of us got to be Mods a couple years ago.

I have been using that tag from pretty much the beginning.

There is discussion in the whitepaper on the math that determined the amount, but it was based on natural SP held by the account at time of calculation.

Some of it was from the decimal change causing a recalculation of the entire rewards pool for a bit, there was also a display bug with palnet.io due to issues with the configuration not matching the new

Should have heard the 30min of discussion in last night's meeting to determine how to nip it. We figured it out eventually.

The goal really is to make it more inviting for people to join in or at least follow along. Hasn't been much of an issue during western hemisphere prime hours, but the late nights there have seen some

That pool appears to be missing the water.

I assume the delay in vote to display on post is due to the delay in SCOT reading the STEEM chain as well? Would love to see those numbers jump without having to refresh a few seconds later.

Yup.

Depends. Since image posting doesn't register on our monitoring system, I doubt it will work. Fitting really, we consider posts with only an image as low effort, I guess chat is the same. :P But we still

Just a standard day job. I am actually changing jobs right now, so I am enjoying a little free time.

It's possible that you didn't meet the requirements to be considered for the claim-drop. Check out this helpful post from another of the Mod team.

Vote removed due to plagiarism.

Votes removed due to multiple rules violations.

Votes removed due to plagiarism.

Several lines are clearly re-worded from the original article. The sentence structure is nearly identical and only have a few key words changed.

I have felt welcomed there by the people there, but I can't say that I feel an urge to spend a great deal of time there for fear I might gain the attention of you or some others. I have the utmost respect

That might be the technical reasoning behind your believing you could do it, but the spirit of both the requests to share is fairly clear. Even if you feel you didn't violate some sort of agreement to

Both sides of the conversation specifically limit the scope of the sharing in that screenshot. They both list that they want to share it with their respective moderator teams in the private channels on

It appears from that screenshot that permission was given on both sides to share with the respective moderator teams. This kind of post to the chain just feels wrong and dirty.