I can only assume you are speaking of me when you say "votes the way he wants, a no".
Unlike you @torran, I directly talked to Aly. I directly mentioned what my issues with him were, why I thought how I thought, and what I felt was important. Then I pushed for him to be heard. I encouraged him to face the community and address his perspective.
But that's not your style. You do not have courage to do that. Instead you simply make up things so you can tear down someone that worked against what you felt was more important.
Also you should get your facts straight, I still have the same problems with what was originally said, and the only thing that has happened is they have been addressed by Aly. Because I did IN FACT gave him a chance to address them. That's how grown-ups handle things. You should try it, it will work I promise.
So I don't give a shit if he changed his vote or not. That was not the point of my post or what I had a problem with. I care that he didn't listen to what 2/3rds of the community was saying, and didn't engage with us before casting a blocking vote.
So I'm happy he did engage, and I'm happy he listened. That's what I'm happy about. His vote was not an issue, the fact that he is the Head of the SPS DAO Foundation and he listened to the SPS holders was.
Too bad you are so clouded in your desire to get what you want that you can't even see when people are trying to help and support the community.
Pitiful.
RE: Supporting the Anti-Bot Proposal: A Step Towards Addressing Community Concerns While Keeping Future Possibilities Open