I'm glad this is coming up for a vote so that people understand that they were given a "voice" on a contentious and complicated issue. So thanks for bringing it forth @clayboyn and keeping your word.

I also will vote it down for several reasons:

One: I don't believe its a compromise at all. The main discussion for unlocking costs was between 2x and 5x. There were a few outliers higher, but basically this is saying that people pay NO MORE to unlock from what has already been voted for the land unlocking.

Put a different way, it does nothing to address the valid concerns of its effect to the economy. Without addressing the concerns of @vugtis and people that think like him, then that's a flawed way to proceed imo.

Two: My major issue was having a time limit and that also was not addressed at all with this vote. I am willing to compromise and bury my biggest issue if others did the same, but they didn't. I could've lived with 2x if it was for a very limited time, like what @vugtis suggested in a compromise, but since that didn't make it into this proposal and we couldn't agree then I can't support this.

The bottom line is I'm very happy that this will get a larger vote in game, and I think this is a good process to follow. We are learning about each other and how to form a compromise (or not). But it is good to figure out either way.

I'm also happy to hear Matt's thoughts about the "costs to unlock" being 4x or higher. That is a guide that will unite many people on this. By having this discussion now, we have had some great ideas surface. Even though I hope this proposal fails, I think the vote will still produce positive results!