RE: RE: Supporting the Anti-Bot Proposal: A Step Towards Addressing Community Concerns While Keeping Future Possibilities Open
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Supporting the Anti-Bot Proposal: A Step Towards Addressing Community Concerns While Keeping Future Possibilities Open

Words
437
Reading
2 min
3y

You can read the thread bitcoinsig@bitcoinsig ...

A. vinicoi

Talking to Dave on his post, I thought the issue was who was behind the vote, not the vote itself. But apparently, after changing the vote, is everything okay? Is it all resolved? Soon, I realize that the real reason for the vote discussion is the proposal itself and not the person behind the vote. That's regrettable

B. followed by a reply to vini from toran

Yeah.. it's pretty funny how when the Head of the SPS DAO Foundation votes the way he wants, a no, it's a travesty and people want to burn down the world... but now that he's changed his vote to a yes in order to appease others, everything's fine.

C. followed by a reply from you

or the fact that he had voted in many other proposals without a peep from the bots for me but not bots for thee crowd

Now you do have an idea why I was attributing your comment to me. I don't feel guilty in the least bit about what I said to Aly publicly or any comments on this issue, I have and always will be direct with people I am discussing matters with.

So now that you know, maybe you can understand why I said that you should address me directly in the future.

However...


You are correct that I attacked you personally, in response to what seemed to be a reference to me (as shown above). Since my attack on you was that I perceived you you were undermining me specifically, then of course that's why I pointed it out.

If you are now saying that you weren't referencing me as part of the "bots for me but not bots for thee crowd" allegation, then I will accept your statement, and admit of course that I unfairly attacked you.

Once you tell me it wasn't me you were referencing, then I will admit that I was wrong, because I would be. I recognize that I inferred the intent based on the chain of the comments along with other comments in discord I've seen. But I will trust you to be honest with me. So was I included in your comment?

If so, it would mean that I did unfairly attack you personally, it would also make me a dick in the process.

I will accept your word, and I will directly apologize to you for personally attacking you and for me being a dick.

I would sincerely hope you would accept my apology. And I would regret any negativity that my behavior caused you.

@davemccoy: You can read | Ecency