I agree that the pack variants are fun and are a good marketing tool, I would like to see them come back on the next set. I think the only place we would differ is that I'm ok with simplifying that part

Well done Nexo! Very good post and happy to see the quality of your content! Thank you for making the post and for sharing your thoughts with others! I look forward to more posts from you and also thrilled

Hey AZ, I think they don't have anything to complain about now after this, this addresses their objections. Whether they come back and buy packs or not, we will have to see. I certainly hope so though.

Top notch, so glad you are leading the community in such vivid storytelling Brave! Thank you :)

really, you don't understand this? You must not hang out in Discord a ton, there was quite a few seething players over this issue on the last set. Players bought packs in the last set, only to find out

there's several things happening in the proposal, not just the conflict score. The proposal was needed because of the change to the pack types, everything else probably could've be done by the team. But

I too like multiple pack types, and I was a big proponent of them on the main set. And like I said above, its cool that you don't want this to pass, especially more so if you don't like conflicts.

Your vote counts @sprstoner. And that's fine that you feel that way, I would expect that there would be a lot of people that would prefer a different solution. The hard part is how to get more than 2/3rds

lol

That's fine that you don't agree FM. In the last set of conflicts there was quite a bit of negativity regarding the formulas for the pack inclusion of the Black Foils. Since things changed again, quite

Sure it can be simplified, but by doing so it might cause it not to pass. Which is fine if you would rather not have conflicts @sprstoner instead of this set of solutions. Anyone can make a proposal, but

Hey @cardeegel this isn't annoying. I would say that you underestimate the complexity of the situaion, and its complicated because it needed to be complicated to solve the issues tackled and still pass.

Love the concept Vugtis! I'm definitely happy to share this with @yabapmatt, Bob, and Royal Eagle. I know we have some new counter mechanics planned for the next set that may enable something like this

just the Conflict Score, the CP stays the same for the Black Foils. for now just the conflicts, later anything is possible yes its random. They get 10 packages if they finish #1, but they won't know for

We'll discuss it, I like the idea. I think your suggestion still can be done based on the spirit of the proposal.

All the foils are still being made, they will just be given out differently. The RF will come via the main conflict, with the GF/BF/ and arcanes coming via the Foil Draws after the main conflict is over.

Its in the first sentence KZ: Eliminate Alchemy and Legendary Packs to simplify the experience, and leave less negative feelings if picking the “wrong pack type”. Because of the changes in both the initial

On the iron, the formula was off relative to the amount of production power needed for each resource to make the wagons. The change was to put it back on the right calculation and make it balanced. You

there's definitely a lot to consider when making changes to something as sensitive as the Conflicts.

Its elaborate because there are a lot of issues to be addressed. One thing affects another and while you didn't have issues with certain parts, other people would have an issue with change. So there had