Touché. You're right. Let me try that again. How about 1 giant leap forward, and 99 steps backwards? 😂 !ENGAGE 25 !tan

!ENGAGE 50 !tan

I'm researching this at the moment and hit on this post. Immediately asked myself how this got past me and then I saw that I'm not following you when I thought I was. Now to start reading everything else

What minimum amounts of BEOS and BTS should one leave in eos-voter? Everything else is still non-transferable, correct?

And pretty good fees you earned?

The fact they have such a problem explaining their product is not exactly a confidence builder.

Lots of that volume is DeFi though. ... which can also move around, back to normal Alts, that is, like, maybe HIVE ...

And probably lot lower rewards/APR for even the smaller tokens that can't get listed on bigger exchanges. I agree that the use case certainly exists, but I'm not sure the astronomical earnings can survive

The bigger the liquidity pools get, the smaller the rewards. There's a direct inverse relationship. Seen from another point of view, if I only pay 0.25% to buy and sell on a centralized exchange, why would

!ENGAGE 25

Absolutely correct. As with everything in life, perspective is key! !ENGAGE 25 !tan

Hope you're feeling okay. !ENGAGE !tan

This looks like capitulation to me. Long term stakeholders should not worry, rather they should celebrate the exit of weak hands and non-believers.

Thanks! !ENGAGE !tan

Bookmarked. Will dive in as soon as I get the time!

Two steps forward, one step backwards. The net result is positive.

!ENGAGE 25 !tan

!ENGAGE 25 !tan

You said it several different ways, but the one I like best is: Just, if the goal is to make Hive a great place for apps, let's not fuck up the one technical thing that we really have going for us and

I wouldn't be surprised at all.