Thank you :) As for SPS, where would this additional SPS amount come from? Wherever it does, we will get a new set of upset players

You are right, prior to SPS it was mostly funded by market fees, but I don't believe it has been for a couple years. I admit I was wrong to say the season rewards were negligible, I had not done the

That's a fair point, I had not done the calculation myself. However, replacing DEC with SPS for season rewards has issues of its own. For example, where would this new season reward come from? We can't

I have spent tens of hours already on the previous iteration of this proposal and honestly, it has had a real mental toll since I received a lot of personal attacks along with the discussion. As I have

Thanks for the response. To clarify, burning DECs is akin to increased ownership. For example, if you have 1% of DECs, and then 50% is burned, you will now have 2%. However, I can understand if you only

Thanks for taking the time to put together this detailed feedback. Below are some counterpoints: As the owner of multiple decks I have rented out on market, this is quite negligible. The fee increase from

Splinterlands has an allocation of SPS in the whitepaper dedicated to tournaments roughly worth $35k per month at the current SPS price (after accounting for the 1% per month reduction in inflation). Looking

I think you have misunderstood how the fees work, please refer to @flauwy's comment in your other post.

I have replied to this below

Hi there, thanks for providing your view. Below are the drawbacks to your suggestions: I believe DEC-B was a huge mistake, and I had many conversations with @yabapmatt trying to convince him out of it.

Hi there, thanks for providing your view. Below are the drawbacks to your suggestions: I believe DEC-B was a huge mistake, and I had many conversations with @yabapmatt trying to convince him out of it.

Good idea, but maybe better to have it spread out as well, not sure. Does liquid still charge a fee? I think they used to charge like 2% or something

Thanks for your consideration, and please message me privately if you want to regarding any further concerns around this proposal.

Thank you for taking the time to voice your reasoning on voting no to this. To address your concerns: The current market conditions is actually a really fair point I had not thought about. Perhaps this

Hi, thanks for taking the time to write out your opinion and although I agree with multiple sentiments you have provided. However, just because something won't solve an issue, a step in the right direction

By distributing it to the DAO, we give the community flexibility to do what they feel is best, which includes simply burning it if that's what the community wants

Almost every NFT project on ETH using OpenSea has a creator royalty, this is what the DAO royalty is trying to replicate. Most projects on Opensea have a 2.5% to 7.5% creator fee plus 2.5% marketplace

You are right, this won't be good for the price of DEC and I think it is rather obvious, so I don't think it will ever reach the 66% approval to simply sell DECs on market. If a proposal like that ever

Here is a list of the top PKM holders. However, that does not include the PKM that are in liquidity pools which is where most people hold their PKM. I personally hold about 0.865% of the liquidity pool

You are right, basically anything that saves my time I would treat it as having "solid utility". Since I wrote this comment, I have also started to understand the utility of cashbacks, many smaller