The potential fix I will speak to Matt about is simply ensuring when a user instant withdraws, it also "powers down" their votes, similar to how you can "power up" if you stake more.

The following edit has been added: "A valid concern raised by @udow is the potential for individuals to unstake and cast votes across multiple accounts using the same amount of SPS, effectively reducing

Great point, I will speak with Matt about how we could potentially circumvent this from a technical standpoint. Furthermore, it seems most people believe 4% is too low, so I may just increase the proposed

I think 15-25% will make no one use it, or very few people. It's true there are protocols that charge nearly or even upwards of 50% penalty for a maximum stake early withdraw, but those protocols may also

Issue with this is someone can withdraw 25% instantly for 1% fee, then another 25% for 1% fee, then another 1% for 25% and so on. However, I do tend to agree we can increase the fee slightly from 4% to

Great to know there will be usage of such a feature!

Firstly, this is definitely not something the DAO should pay for at this stage when we are struggling to keep the lights on. Alternatively, have you thought of another strategy like redirecting 30% of

Market makers are undeniably crucial, particularly within centralized exchanges, and they hold immense significance for smaller marketcap coins like SPS. Their presence ensures trading activity, preventing

Thanks mate, we're planning to keep developing our core business model on an EVM blockchain while working to improve Hive/SPL infrastructure.

Thank you Dave, we appreciate your support!

I think more to the point is this: We cannot control price, but we can say this proposal alone has reduced the DEC supply by over 1% in a few short months. That is massive in my books...

Yes, so do I.

I do like the idea of a great burning but for cards, however I have a couple of reservations/questions I'd like to get cleared up before I vote. Will cards from various editions carry varying 'values'

Hi all, as a large liquidity provider and overall stakeholder in this game I am quite divided on this proposal. I agree with all the pros listed above but I would also consider some of the potential cons:

I'm sure you all know I am a huge fan of getting DECs to peg, but I'll have to vote no on this proposal as I don't think this is the right way to do it. Among the many reasons others have listed, my biggest

We will post periodic updates on the progress of the @dec.burn account which the community can upvote. However, initially this may be done a bit less frequently than weekly but will become more often as

You should check Opensea, where most popular NFTs including Runis have a 5% fee which is charged on top of the 2.5% platform fee. Most people are paying 7.5% plus gas fees which is often a flat $10-12,

I think the 100k DEC fee is fair, otherwise we'll see too many proposals and I don't have time to read that much! However, if you do have an idea you are passionate about, you can always try to mention

Honestly, this is very good research, I didn't even know we had unallocated LP rewards. However, I don't believe reducing DEC supply by minting more SPS is the way to go. The point of burning DEC is to

Thanks, I really do appreciate your words of support and I also believe this will turn out hugely beneficial for all, even those who are currently fighting against it!