But wont this minting in advance increase risks of exploits? just my thinking is if they are not minted in advance they wont be exploitable rather the buckets will be there but minted gradually into their

i dont think that is the case here , I own 1 but i dont have a ton of sps.@ clayboyn I thought Runi should be a card which can do what other cards can not do. like eg playing with it while being staked

I know and understand this very well however spl team are working on both sides at the moment the game is not fully decentralized. My thinking is since there is now a Dao important decisions like this

The unitial agreement was to put 50/50 prize pool right?? So what is wrong with that now lol ?? By reducing my rewards in wild you are making it look like it is a crime playing that mode and it also tells

That is not the fault of the player I guess. You are now trying to make it look like it’s the fault players that this is happening. We proposed kyc. The team said no and they created 2 formats to accommodate

80/20 sounds fair given your comment above

fair point but if the system is not working i think they need to put it down and fix the issues imagine if this goes on for a month how much money will be stuck in this engine

@clove71, @everyone

thanks I realized latter i saw that i was wrong in my understanding of the matter. i even voted for the proposal

you have a great point the dao can also delagate the sps rather that giving people free cash

will up vote this

this is a yess for me

i do support this point I dont see the reason why only 20 people in 1000s of players only enjoy this leaderboard thing.

if the exchange was binance i was going to vote yes. and i also think that this proposal was suggested when we had gazillion of players and the team was trying to have many sps channels. With the current

I think we need more information here and explanation on exactly what are you talking about here:, "The way that the Splinterlands organization operates will also change significantly going forward,

I am in support of this but I am interested to know where the rewards are going currently?

yah but the goal is for sps to be staked so cons number 1 is not really a cons

For me I think the fee structure should remain as is because according to my thinking I don't understand why the third party marketplaces are better than the game market place. That in itself does not

I think the definition of solid utility is subjective. maybe you can explain further you meaning of solid utility

I think the comparizon with other players part is not sitting well with me because automatically the new payers are going to be out of the equation as the new chaos cards are far much less pp compared