I'm not appointing them (that's why we're voting) and didn't even select the names myself. They were all recommended to me as good candidates to put forth to the community. We have weekly meetings that are open to anyone that are held in the Team Possible discord server as well as other regular meetings with community members and I'm always around if anyone wants to discuss things or make suggestions.

Ideally, I would actually love if at some point we could build out on-chain treasurer voting similar to how we do for validators. Right now I think survival and fulfilling our outstanding obligations have to take priority.

All of that said, I do understand your position and if the DAO doesn't think this is the best way to proceed, then I'd suggest voting against the proposal and suggesting a better way. Last time we tried using a custom voting page on peakmonsters, but that also has issues as it's a third party tool that isn't directly visible to all voters so we end up in a similar position.

Personally, I don't care who the treasurers are as long as the DAO votes to approve them and feels they're trustworthy. I haven't seen any red flags with any of the people that were suggested this time. I simply asked (I think 6 or 7?) people that were recommended by the community and these are 4 that said yes. Others didn't want to be a treasurer for whatever reason. It's a volunteer gig and some people don't want that responsibility or hassle.