I ran several polls asking the DAO what was desired in relation to defi reform. Bridging to BASE was the winner over Solana. More importantly "why" is that CoinBase is supposed to be adding native

The proposal just passed and is being rolled out. If you are part of a qualifying failed project you may be able to get one.

Like the one we just passed to give 30m SPS and 100,000 Rebellion packs and free accounts to web3 gamers affected by failed projects?

If people feel strongly about it I'd suggest voting against this one and then we can reassess. @tidepodoreos already pointed out some of the issues. One thing that I think could be a big win for community

They're free to help out and recommend projects.

Thanks Mr. Chair, it's definitely a challenging job but I love it.

Noted, I felt 5 was better as I view myself as more of a support member to the group. Just having 2 didn't make since and having 3 + me meant we could end up in a situation where 2 would just override

Bjangles and captaindingus volunteered. Stever and synest3r were approached specifically because they interact with those other games outside of the HIVE ecosystem. The core idea behind all of this was

novice adept intermediate advanced expert

So here's the thing, I actually did. A year ago. It's even coded into the next hardfork that we'll have 24 hour windows on multisig. Here we are a year later still trying to suffer through it and make

The original request was for what you see above plus a personal discretionary fund. Myself and the foundation guys felt that was too much. If the DAO wants to empower me and the treasurers to make

If I approved any kind of spending of the DAO's money on anything and the Treasurers approved it, I would be putting on the monthly invoices as stated above. So far the only examples I have are that I've

For what it's worth, I think we either need more treasurers or we'd have to look at centralizing their time zones better, which has its own risks. Not being able to get 6 treasurers together in a 1 hour

I helped him work through the numbers this week before he made the post.

I like the idea of having a group of DAO members that are active in other games help to sort of "pre approve" the projects and then having the DAO vote to approve including them. It should help

Yes we discussed the vetting process in the stream I linked above. The DAO will have to vote to approve projects as well.

The summary is linked at the bottom of the post. It's a google doc. You can click here if you'd like.

@davemccoy and @blazekos joined me for a DAOn Hall to discuss this whole idea in more detail. I'd invite everyone that couldn't attend to check it out: