Login
Discover
Waves
Communities
Write
Login
Signup
clayboyn
@clayboyn
75
Followers
5390
Following
658
Follow
Email digest
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Created
2016-08-24 01:10
RSS Feed
Subscribe
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
clayboyn
spsdao
5M
RE: Proposal in Progress
The company already has roughly an equivalent amount of sales. We'd more or less be annualizing them and taking on the risk that they are unable to keep up with the past 4 year average sales. In return
$ 0.108
2
clayboyn
spsdao
5M
RE: Proposal in Progress
I've spent quite a bit of time in discussions and analyzing the financials with Dave. The DAO doesn't have to keep the company afloat for 2 years. I think the realistic situation is that if we don't want
$ 0.000
1
clayboyn
spsdao
5M
RE: Proposal in Progress
In cases where non-Splinterlands assets are used, Steem Monsters Corp will value those tokens at market value at the time of receipt. In cases where DEC tokens are used for payments, then the price will
clayboyn
spsdao
5M
RE: Proposal in Progress
Yes, after 2 years we could assess if a similar deal makes sense for the DAO and/or company moving forward. Either way we retain co-ownership of the IP if the proposal runs to completion.
clayboyn
spsdao
5M
RE: Proposal in Progress
There are still clear and tangible deliverables related to repayment. The core set, miniset as well as other revenue streams that the company currently has, such as seasonal events and market fees, would
clayboyn
spsdao
5M
RE: Proposal in Progress
I think in general we don't want to go into the direction of the DAO micromanaging every development. You can see very recently how that turned out on the Survival mode restart where we already had several
clayboyn
spsdao
5M
RE: Proposal in Progress
It would mean we both equally own the IP. In the event something happens with the company, we still own the IP. It can't be sold or taken from us and we don't remove their rights to use it either. We could
clayboyn
spsdao
5M
RE: Proposal in Progress
There is a full audit of DAO assets that I do every month on the DAO's blog page. Not an April Fool joke lol.
clayboyn
spsproposal
6M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Bring Brackets to Modern
Well Jimmy, the level restrictions are the compromise it takes for this to have any chance at passing. Arguably yes you could do the same behaviors with max level cards, but at that point the cost to do
clayboyn
spsproposal
6M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Bring Brackets to Modern
So this actually couldn't be further from the truth in your case specifically and I'm going to show you why. I just pulled your data and know exactly how much SPS you're earning and how many matches you've
clayboyn
spsproposal
6M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Bring Brackets to Modern
Vote no if you'd like to do so.
clayboyn
spsproposal
6M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Bring Brackets to Modern
CP doesn't really work anymore (if it ever did). Black Foils more or less threw CP out the window, even for tournaments. We used to be able to gate tournaments with CP because you could just do RF and
clayboyn
spsproposal
6M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Bring Brackets to Modern
I actually just updated it to make a smoother progression in champ while trying to address some of the concerns. The minimum card levels are not really negotiable as people have proven time and time again
clayboyn
spsproposal
6M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Bring Brackets to Modern
There is no climbing or league advancement. You simply choose the bracket appropriate to your collection level. If you try to play in champ with level 1 cards, you won't find any playable cards. If you
clayboyn
Hive Polls
6M
RE: Survival Mode – Do We Need More Space to Refine?
That's why I think option 4 makes sense... see if people will even interact with it without SPS rewards.
clayboyn
Hive Polls
6M
RE: Survival Mode – Do We Need More Space to Refine?
I'd be fine with 3 or 4... I think I like 4 slightly more because I'd like to know if people would participate without SPS rewards, but either is fine with me I suppose.
clayboyn
spsproposal
7M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Don't Change PP Values
The idea is that Chaos Legion production points is the "base line." Rebellion is currently half of Chaos Legion as well as Conclave Arcana. The team announced in the Town Hall that when a set
clayboyn
spsproposal
7M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Don't Change PP Values
It wasn't changed. Rebellion and Conclave Arcana are 0.5x.
clayboyn
spsproposal
7M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Don't Change PP Values
This only relates to the production points on land of cards when they rotate out of modern. It doesn't really have anything to do with the Modern format beyond that. For instance, currently when Rebellion
clayboyn
spsproposal
7M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Don't Change PP Values
I added it, we'll see if that helps.
← Latest
Older →