The "SaaSpocalypse" is both understated and overstated. Overstated because core systems of record and storage remain (Salesforce, Snowflake, etc.)

Nearly every SaaS app inside Vercel has been replaced by a generated app or agent interface, deployed on the same platform Support, sales, marketing, PM, HR, dataviz, even design and video workflows —

Software Factory enables every company to realize that vision

It's about putting everything on the line against the best in the world to see what the battles at the very top are like.

But that's what it's all about. It's not about the money. It's not about the fame. Sure, those are nice, but…

After months of fighting and being sent back to 5k matches after attempting shots, he later said something memorable. Had to see for himself — what the battles are like at the top Some might call that

One highly talented poker player deliberately chose to face the toughest online competition at 10k and 20k on the strictest regulated sites, even though he was dominating the 5k pool and essentially the

Exactly this ♾️

After that, two and a half junior developers finished the rebuild in 2.5 weeks It launches as an updated Planner module within Software Factory on Tuesday It’s clean, elegant and very useful

That phase let the lead PM, designer and architect precisely define requirements, while Software Factory filled in details and helped senior engineers refine the technical direction

A skilled team used Software Factory to rebuild and replace Jira in just over a month The project began with 3.5 weeks of planning — Software Factory’s superpower

A replacement for Jira has been developed and is now integrated into Software Factory.

It's true developers wrote bad code before AI. What's missing is that the entire quality infrastructure assumed the author and the debugger were the same person. That world ended last year and nothing

Old slop had an owner. Someone could explain why temp_fix_v3_FINAL existed, which edge case it handled, and what would break if it was removed. New slop has an approver. A fundamentally different relationship

Tests verify behavior, not understanding

When 41% of a codebase is generated by a machine and approved by a human who only skimmed it because the tests passed, review becomes theater. The reviewer is checking code neither of them authored. Linters

All of it assumes one thing: the author can walk a reviewer through what the code does when asked That assumption held for 50 years. It broke in about 18 months

Developers have always written slop. The software industry is built on infrastructure meant to catch sloppy code before it ships: code review, linting, type checking, CI/CD pipelines, staging environments.

A randomized controlled trial found experienced developers using AI tools were 19% slower than developers working without them

41% of all code shipped in 2025 was AI-generated or AI-assisted The defect rate on that code is 1.7× higher than human-written code