Sorry, not sorry, I had to.
Occasionally, still thinking of labels and how constraining they are. So why not play around? From plain silly to plain outdated and irrelevant.
One has to admit that the "means of production" has a limited place in the spectrum of it all, whether you look at today's economy going service-intensive or whether you consider that, "once it all collapses and we are all living in Hobbit homes," what economic activities we would be engaging in.
And of course you cannot have "intellectual property" without the vanguard of the state and wouldn't survive in a stateless society. That is fairly straightforward. Other than that, honour your contracts, for your reputation if nothing else.
You work for wages? According to the definition compiled in Wikipedia, you're "working class." I suppose then, if you're self-employed, you're not. Either you're not working or you don't belong to that class. I'll go pour myself some more kava.
Have I mentioned I like to mix things up? But, seriously, "right-wing socialists" is not mine. It is off of George Orwell's Homage to Catalonia, which I was reading in early 2014. Fascinating the convoluted dynamics of various states at the intersection of the Spanish Civil War despite, or perhaps because of, their labels. For all the communist that it was, the USSR literally took a position against the coalition of forces that included, among others, anarcho-communists in the front against fascism. We know through history that the Bolsheviks (they would qualify as right-wing socialists in George Orwell's paradigm) and anarchists didn't get along, but really? (More on that in the Wikipedia article on anarchism in Russia.) All the more reason to do away with the state. Jus' sayin'.
Quality over quantity, please!
Vegan statists. How do they do it, man, how do they do it?
Happy weekend!
Love and laughs,
C.A.A.