Here's the major issue at hand:

You have a complex topic, with a ton of moving parts. The team, I'm sure, has spreadsheets flowcharts and everything else to keep track of what was said and when/where...

It is highly evident that despite what the team may have said or insinuated... that a lot of people believed that Rebellion Cards and beyond would have .5PP compared to CL post rotation.

For me personally, I believed this to be the case and don't remember ever hearing they would bump up post Rotation... In fact, I distinctly remember the opposite being said and that was a "Reason to stock on up on CL!! They're about to be OOP and every set going forward will be .5PP or reduced further to keep CL Value!!"

However, instead of arguing about what was/wasn't said... I am fully in support of the community making this decision together.

Pros:

Helps keep RB Value Post Rotation
Helps RB Owners

Cons:

Dilutes Land PP
Makes CL Cards worth a little less as Land Workers

Reality:

The original reason behind the PP Nerf was because everyone was worried about the PP dilution from sets like Chaos Legion - "In the future these cards will be worthless because there will be too much PP"!!

But check the data:

Avg CL GFL CC: ~ 1,500
Avg RB GFL CC: < 200

Honestly to me after reconsidering this issue and the implication... the team is saying this was something they were always planning to do, some of the community say they remember otherwise - I'd love to see some evidence pointing either way Hive account@clayboyn

However, in the end, here's what matters:

A. If the team DID state this somewhere and we have evidence that PP would bump post rotation - we should bump PP

It doesn't affect Land Production much and it was always "the plan" - I may have misheard, misremembered things... I'm human, this happens.

B. If the team DID NOT state this somewhere and we DO NOT have evidence that PP would bump post rotation - we should not bump PP

Gameplay wise - bumping PP for RB will have a negligible effect on Land PP, especially with the sets being DRASTICALLY SMALLER than CL.

IF we do go the "Remove .5PP Post Rotation", we should just get rid of it altogether because with BF and Land Cards the majority of cards aren't going to be efficient on land anyway.