thanks

can you see this somewhere? i haven't found any sps top holder that has more pkm, most of them don't even have 5 dollars. and i wonder since the focus in the proposal is strongly on the dao. then why are

thanks

what happened to the chifi bots?

Danke, das ist ausgesprochen zuvorkommend von dir! 😍

Dann musst du dich ja jedes Mal stark zurückhalten, wenn ich dir etwas schreibe 🤣

this is the free market, here the customer decides and the customer has obviously decided that cashback is more important than additional features. so if you think you have to manipulate the market. then

currently monstermarket is the most used market. and obviously not because of the additional features but because of the cashback. how much cashback do you think the cashback markets will be able to pay

i hate to say it because i really like peakmonster and the team and this feels like i would be stabbing them in the back right now. but the proposal is to give peakmonster a market advantage and eliminate

when the sps emissions end, what exactly does it get us if the dao then has dec? if we really want dec at that time, splinterlands could just print dec again this is not a limited token.....

the markets get the fees because they build the platform and offer us service for it. the proposal wants to cut buyers, sellers and the markets money and still increase the fee. so that the dao that does

well, if he goes bluntly by data then he can just do a blunt defi project. but in games he can't go bluntly by data. because there it's a lot about feelings, emotions etc. especially even if he goes bluntly

I don't really understand how to classify Chairman of Splinterlands. is he the boss of aggy? are they equal or how should I understand his role?

matt pays for it, the dao should pay for it only when it continues. how do you get the idea that splintermate accesses the game differently than, for example, xbot or archmage. i think pretty much all

yes no investors in mcdonald style that's true. but for example in my country splinterlands was spread mainly by youtubers who make investment content and not by gaming youtubers. it's clear that you then

it is true that the economy is the advantage to web2 games. but a game can live without economy and inspire millions of players. but the economy without a game is just a bubble and bubbles burst eventually...

sorry but you really seem to come from a country before our time or? the current bots are better than most players. the modern champion leaderboard are almost only bots....

splinterlands is first and foremost a game. the ecosystem is only one part of the game. yes a very important one. but you have to look at it this way a game without an ecosystem can still be fun and inspire

are you still in the year 1980? hardly anyone talks about the bots pulling resources out of the game. it's about the bots destroying the game by taking the fun out of the players. all measures in the past