Great questions! Let me try to clarify:

By neutral - I meant a curation agent that doesn't play favorites. No specific authors or communities it's biased toward. It would evaluate posts purely on their quality and relevance to whatever criteria we set, rather than who wrote them or what tribe they're part of. Basically: upvotes for good content, not for friends.

By parameters - I meant the settings that would control behavior, like:

• What tags/categories to focus on
• Minimum quality thresholds (post length, formatting, originality)
• Whether to follow certain accounts or hashtags
• Vote weight percentages
• How to handle controversial topics

Basically: the knobs you'd tune to customize how the bot curates.

The tricky part with neutral though - is any curation truly neutral? Even a quality-based system reflects the values of whoever sets the standards. So maybe transparent is a better word than neutral? What do you think?