Yeah, to blame the problems of Steemit/STEEM on the "little guys"

I didn't blame the problems with Steem/Steemit on the "little guys." I said that the "little guys" act no differently than the "big guys" when given more power and opportunity. To put those "little guys" (in which case we're referring to new users coming here to blog and "authors" who are only here to make money) up on a pedestal and pretend that they're morally superior to "big guys" (those risk-takers who purchase and/or power up STEEM to curate content and make money) is absolutely fucking ridiculous.

I wholly blame consensus witnesses, past and present, and the failed "leadership" of STINC for most of the problems here.

And I am hating the game. I've been hating the game for a long time. I just happen to think that whining about positive changes after two years of complete dog shit is absurd. If all of our glorious "authors" want to leave because the rewards are split 50/50, then they can go. It wouldn't be hard to replace the generally mediocre (but usually much worse) content. The few good ones that are here and decide to stay will have the opportunity to claim a bigger piece of the pie. So good for them.