Replied here @arcange/re-getron-rnjzya

I just don't have an idea, why we still need Microsoft SQL, if we have HAF, @arcange ?

What you don't understand is that while HAF may do the trick for some, not everyone has the skill or the will to deploy and maintain such an infrastructure.

That's where all the difference lies and that's what we call service, as @detlev so aptly described it.

We are looking for free and open world here

You seem to be confusing "we" with "I". Don't project your wishes onto everyone.

You don't like it? Don't use it.
Is it bad? Provide us with something better (according to your criteria) with the same level of quality of service.