I hope you have a swift recovery.

Well, you are certainly leading me to delve further into the lingo of virology. I have now read a number of scientific articles on the subject (and even listened to a video on the subject of virus isolation

At least at that time, there was no isolated virus available to the CDC, which can only mean the ‘virus’ was never initially isolated as numerous studies claimed to have done, including the CDC study published

Hi @jasonliberty, I only did a quick search, and couldn't find the article I referenced. But I did listen to the NBC broadcast again and as to the first part, it seems we even agree about what it means,

Thank you for the link. It seems that answers the question. I think that even in the normal case, the patent system as it is designed is an abomination and should be eliminated. That it would be enforced

Now you argue again as if there was, or could be a disaster. You've got to decide on this and I think you already did. An epic disaster, by its very nature, cannot be prevented by human influence. Otherwise

I note that you know that the scientific community says that this is a phenomenon that has a global average fatality rate of less than one per cent - it falls within the range of countless other life risks

If the phenomenon of which there seems to be so much fear existed, you would probably have already experienced mass deaths in your life so far, you would have been a surviving witness to such an event.

I'm not saying that the speaker is laughable. And I have no prejudice against the Chinese. Nor do I think the speaker is lying. I think you just don't understand the meaning of what he is saying, because

Lol, are you memeing yourself here? What exactly am I repeating from what "authority tells me"? And point to specific things, instead of just making blanket statements like above. There's no

Also, your idea about not believing the chinese CDC is laughable. As you should have probably guessed, the first genomic mappings of sars-cov-2 were performed by Chinese scientists. They were, after all,

The virus had to be isolated (samples collected and grown in a lab) in order for vaccines to be made. I suppose you think that all the vaccines are just randomly made from ivermectin /s. You're using a

OMFG, I just watched your "video evidence" (it didn't take me that long, cause after about 5 seconds I already guessed the content, and could just skip to the relevant section which is a sound

No, I didn't watch a video. How about you just write a couple sentences that explain your position (i.e. just answer a simple question)? Ok, so you're referring to an idea that is so uncommon that you

Your believe into a proven ‘fact-checking’ liars is a religious one. I do not exactly understand what you're trying to say above. But it mostly seems to be off the real point anyways, so I'm not asking

I understand your point, but I am not sure it is true in this case. It depends on if production would be higher or not if the patents did not exists. For most patents, I think it is fair to assume they

There are no proof of any new variant as there is no virus isolated. Even the ‘fact-checkers’ cannot say that, because it isn’t isolated. This is completely false. It takes less than 2 minutes searching

AFAICT, you've got it mostly entirely wrong. It's not "are not allowed except for very specific reasons". Instead, businesses CAN "refuse service except for very specific reasons" (at

Haven't businesses always been allowed to refuse service to customers? Do you think they shouldn't have that right?